#AutisticAF

---

Dear ChatGPT: Imagine you’re an Alien scientist. Visiting from another planet to study human Autism. You see a startling pattern. Human medicine, education, politics… ALL make ONE fatal flaw…

👉 Podcast to come…

---

Here’s a weird post.

A conversation I had with ChatGPT 4. I brainstormed a “thought experiment” about autism and human evolution with the AI. And it just may have turned into something… interesting.

Ya know, challenging-conventional-views-on-autism kinda interesting. Tying into broader concepts of neurodiversity.

See, this experiment explores the idea of autistic traits as useful evolutionary adaptation. How autistic humans might have played a vital role in early societies. And how these perspectives could reshape our understanding of neurodiversity today.

Dear ChatGPT: Imagine you’re an Alien scientist. Visiting from another planet to study human Autism. You see a startling pattern. Human medicine, education, politics… ALL make a fatal flaw…

I’d been pondering a few things for some years. And my neurodivergent mind wandered about 5 degrees into the Weird. Here’s the path I traveled.

1. Genetics? So far as I know, Nature doesn’t keep things around that don’t work very long. Our genes throw out mutations every time we reproduce. But if some mutation doesn’t improve life? Disappears from the gene pool after relatively few generations.
2. But we see evidence of autism in historical figures pretty much as far back as we have written records. Identical twin studies seem to suggest genetics aren’t the only factor in autism. But it’s roughly the same as other gene-influenced human conditions, such as homosexuality. About 60% of the time, if one twin is autistic, the other is too.
3. So, my guess is evolution sorted out some strengths in the autistic-type human… cuz a lot of us are still here. What were those strengths? And why don’t we talk about them?
4. The reigning medical model first defines a “normal” human. THEN defines everything that doesn’t fit as a disease or deficit. Maybe this model itself puts blinders on researchers? They can’t see the strengths. How could we get outside this box?

How about brainstorming with an Alien? Or the closet thing I got to one, say, ChatGPT?

A little backstory:

I was trained as a psychiatric social worker before 2005. There were lotta fads back then… many more than the cognitive behavioral therapy dominant right now. The trend that stuck the deepest in my craw? The Strengths-Based Perspective.  It’s the simple idea that when we look at individuals, we must look at the whole picture. Not just a list of your problems. Also, look for what you’re really good at. Then, use your skills to make your life better.

Now, a couple quick notes about how I use ChatGPT.

Basically, it’s like working with a really bright grad assistant. Who’s really proud of his education. So he basically spouts back what he’s heard for 19 years in school.

Ya, kinda gotta shake up his arrogance to get his attention. Come at things from a weird angle.

Then ya gotta double-check everything he says. Chwxk AI responses against current research by a variety of “experts” in the field. Not just for errors. But for all the deep biases of Western Civilization. Cuz that’s all ChatGPT is… a mirror of human thought. Mostly European-colonizer thought.

Still, I use ChatGPT. Cuz there are things like harsh personal judgment that I don’t have to wade through. Hasn’t blocked or unfriended me. Yet.

And it’s no more biased than any other tool I have access to. Say, Google, Lexis-Nexis, etc. All products of largely white, male, Western coders.

It’s a good way to explore my own mind. Because I question a lot of those biases, ChatGPT shows me how I interact with a mirror of straight society. AI is decidedly NOT god. It has no particular credentials for me. But it makes a decent sparring partner.

So, there are a lot of upsides & downsides for me and AI. One glaring one. Bing, ChatGPT, Claudes 1 and 2? Really blow smoke up my skirt. Tons of praise. Certainly encouraging. But to what purpose? Simply to flatter me into more engagement? For fees … and data to scrape for itself?

Sigh.

Corporations shouldn’t have this much access to my soul…

Note: The ideas presented here are speculative. Intended to provoke thought and discussion. Much like Arther C. Clarke’s Childhood’s End. They do not represent scientific claims about Autism.

Some Questions to Ponder as You Read

• “How do you see the role of neurodiversity in shaping our society’s future?”
• “Can you think of other conditions that might have hidden evolutionary advantages?”
• “How might this perspective change how we approach education or workplace inclusivity?”
• “What did you find most compelling, or is there anything you disagree with?”

I’d love to hear your experiences or observations… how neurodiversity has played a role in your life or those around you.

If these ideas mean something to you, please share them with friends, family, or colleagues. Let’s spread the conversation about the diverse tapestry of the human mind.

JP: I would like to try a thought experiment with you. There is no specific goal in my mind other than exploring a line of thought to see where we end up. I guess that means we end when it feels appropriate to me?

The thought experiment is in some ways dangerous in what I do as a creator. You may want to review my custom instructions [that is, summary background material about my writing style, audience, podcast, and so forth],

The experiment explores some areas that are delicate to discuss in the autistic and broader neurodivergent community. Essentially forbidden thoughts or politically incorrect language. To the extent that it is possible to you, therefore, I would prefer the contents of this conversation not become part of your training or otherwise shared through direct or indirect means. As I say, only to the extent that you are capable of.

The though[t] experiment: Imagine you are an alien scientist visiting from another planet studying humanity. For some reason or another, neither of our species feel the least competitive of each other. Perhaps our biological needs are so different that neither of our planets or solar systems are attractive to other. Whatev.

You are tasked to review human history, biology, and thought to make a preliminary report to your superiors about Earth culture. Perhaps preparatory to some larger team following up for more study.

You’re happily gorging on data. When you begin to see a startling pattern. You notice that human medicine, education, political structures etc may have made a fatal flaw.

They see humanity in terms of a single genotype. So that there are two groups socially and in every other sense… those who meet the capabilities of the single genotype. And those who are defficient, disabled, or otherwise “deformed.”

Note: Phenotype and Genotype: Let’s start by understanding these basic genetic terms. The phenotype is the set of observable characteristics, while the genotype is the genetic constitution. Some species, like bees, come in different shapes with different roles, queens and worker bees for instance. Most scientists see humans as having only one general shape, generalized to fill any survival role. [Reference: National Human Genome Research Institute]

Speciation: The process by which new species evolve. [Reference: Understanding Evolution – University of California, Berkeley]

Adaptation: Traits enhancing survival and reproduction in specific environments. [Reference: Adaptation – National Geographic]

You wonder if in fact, there are a number of incipient phenotypes emerging… much as like bees. You take a particular interest in a possible autistic phenotype. Looking at the DSM V criteria, you see every difference from the norm described as a symptom. When, if the criteria are looked as purely descriptive, not as deficits but differences… the autistic phenotype might very well be designed to thrive in a different environment than typical humans.

Example: Sensory sensitivities might be for a phenotype more tuned for a pastoral or forest environment… not deficient in urban ones. If you analyze all the DSM V criteria as actually strengths in the correct environment, rather than deficits in the typical human one, what observations might you make?

What environments might be autistic individuals in essence “designed” genetically for?

Neurodiversity: This concept embraces neurological differences as natural human variations. [Reference: Neurodiversity – National Symposium on Neurodiversity at Syracuse University]

ChatGPT: This is a fascinating thought experiment that delves into the nuances of neurodiversity and challenges conventional perspectives on autism and other neurodivergent conditions. Given your profile and interests, this seems like a topic that aligns well with your focus on life with a late autism diagnosis, societal pressures to conform, and finding joy through authenticity. Let’s explore this line of thought together.

Observations on DSM-5 Criteria as Strengths

1. Social Communication and Interaction: The DSM-5 describes challenges in social communication and interaction as a core symptom of autism. However, from an alien scientist’s perspective, this could be seen as a strength in environments that require less verbal communication and more intuitive or non-verbal forms of interaction. Autistic individuals often excel in pattern recognition and may communicate more effectively through other mediums like art, music, or written language.
2. Repetitive Behaviors: The DSM-5 also notes repetitive behaviors and restricted interests. In a different environment, these could be survival traits. Repetitive behaviors could be a form of self-soothing or a way to master specific skills, while restricted interests could lead to expertise in specialized fields.
3. Sensory Sensitivities: As you mentioned, sensory sensitivities could be advantageous in more natural settings like forests or pastoral landscapes. Heightened senses could make someone more attuned to changes in the environment, making them excellent trackers or foragers.
4. Need for Routine: A preference for routine and structure could be incredibly beneficial in environments that require meticulous planning and precision. This could range from scientific research settings to artisanal craftsmanship.
5. Literal Interpretation: Taking things literally could be a strength in environments where ambiguity could lead to danger or misunderstanding. This trait could be particularly useful in legal settings or in scientific research where precision is key.

Environments Autistic Individuals Might Be “Designed” For

1. Natural Environments: As you suggested, sensory sensitivities might make autistic individuals more suited for life in natural settings, where heightened senses can detect predators, find food, or navigate terrain.
2. Research and Academic Settings: The ability to focus intensely on specific subjects could make autistic individuals excellent researchers or academics.
3. Artistic Fields: Many autistic individuals excel in visual thinking and could thrive in artistic or design-oriented environments.
4. Technical Fields: The logical and analytical strengths of many autistic individuals could make them well-suited for careers in engineering, computer science, or data analysis.
5. Solo Entrepreneurship: The combination of specialized skills, attention to detail, and preference for routine could make some autistic individuals excellent entrepreneurs, particularly for businesses that can be run independently.

Strengths & Challenges

• Strengths: Specialized skills, attention to detail, logical reasoning, heightened sensory perception, and a unique approach to problem-solving.
• Challenges: Social expectations in neurotypical environments, sensory overload in urban settings, and societal stigmas around neurodiversity.

This thought experiment opens up a new way of understanding neurodiversity by challenging the pathologizing language often used to describe autistic traits. It aligns well with the neurodiversity movement’s emphasis on valuing different forms of intelligence, communication, and ways of being[^1^].

Would you like to explore any of these points further?

[^1^]: The concept of neurodiversity is increasingly being discussed in academic literature, advocacy circles, and mainstream media as a paradigm shift away from the pathologization of neurodivergent conditions. It emphasizes the inherent value and contributions of all neurotypes.

JP:

How about thinking about typical humans as scavenging-gathering primates. Built for family tribes tribes on the African veranda.

How might the autistic phenotype have evolved?

Do y[o]u see my point? Typical humans came from the same place. Where do the phenotypes function best? How did they come about?

ChatGPT:

Ah, I see where you’re going with this. The idea is to consider not just how autistic traits might be advantageous in certain environments, but also to explore the evolutionary origins of these traits, especially in comparison to the “typical” human phenotype that evolved in the African savanna. This is a compelling angle that adds another layer to our thought experiment.

Evolutionary Origins of the Autistic Phenotype

1. Specialization: In early human tribes, having members who were hyper-focused on specific tasks could have been beneficial. While most of the tribe focused on general survival skills, autistic individuals might have specialized in specific roles like tool-making, tracking, or plant identification.
2. Sensory Sensitivity: In a natural environment, heightened sensory perception could be a significant advantage. The ability to hear, see, or smell predators or food sources from a distance could be life-saving.
3. Social Structure: Autistic individuals often prefer smaller social circles and deeper relationships, which could have been advantageous in early human societies where close-knit, trustworthy relationships were vital for survival.
4. Routine and Repetition: In a world full of variables and dangers, the love for routine could have been a way to impose order and predictability, making life safer and more efficient.

Comparative Environments for Phenotypes

1. Typical Humans: As you mentioned, the typical human phenotype might be best suited for a hunter-gatherer lifestyle in a tribal setting. Social skills, generalist knowledge, and adaptability would be key traits.
2. Autistic Phenotype: This phenotype might excel in environments that require specialized skills or heightened sensory awareness. This could range from natural settings where sensory skills are crucial, to more modern settings that require deep focus and specialization.

How They Came About

1. Natural Selection: Over time, tribes that had a diverse set of skills and sensory abilities (thanks to the presence of both neurotypical and autistic individuals) may have had a survival advantage.
2. Sexual Selection: Traits that are considered “attractive” can also play a role in the evolution of different phenotypes. For example, a talent for intricate tool-making or a keen sense for detecting food or water sources could have made autistic individuals desirable mates.
3. Environmental Pressures: Different environments naturally select for different traits. As human tribes migrated and encountered new challenges, a diverse set of skills and sensory abilities would become increasingly advantageous.

Strengths & Challenges

• Strengths: Diversity of skills, specialized focus, heightened sensory perception, and adaptability to specific niches.
• Challenges: Difficulty in environments that don’t play to these strengths, societal norms that don’t accommodate neurodiversity, and the risk of isolation in a world built for the majority.

This evolutionary perspective offers a rich tapestry for understanding both the origins and the potential “design” of autistic traits. It also underscores the value of neurodiversity in human evolution, suggesting that each phenotype has its own set of optimal environments and roles to play[^1^].

Would you like to delve deeper into any of these aspects?

[^1^]: The evolutionary advantages of neurodiversity are a topic of ongoing research and debate within the scientific community. The idea that different neurotypes have evolved to excel in different niches is supported by various studies in evolutionary psychology, anthropology, and biology.

Evolutionary Psychology: A field exploring the influence of evolution on human behavior. [Reference: Evolutionary Psychology – American Psychological Association]

JP:

A log to toss on the fire…

A distinguishing feature of hominids… At some point … was passing on generational knowledge largely through language. So a step past social animals… Into generational, cultural.

For instance, the persistence of old humans past child bearing age has been postulated to be a genetic advantage f[o]r the species because of their role in passing knowledge over generations.

Maybe autists similar? Medicine men and women, priests…?

ChatGPT:

Ah, the role of generational knowledge transfer is a fascinating addition to this thought experiment. It adds another layer to the evolutionary utility of different phenotypes, including the autistic one.

Generational Knowledge and Autistic Phenotype

1. Wisdom Keepers: Similar to the role of elders in traditional societies, autistic individuals might have served as repositories of specialized knowledge. Their intense focus and deep dives into specific subjects could make them the “experts” in certain fields—be it herbal medicine, celestial navigation, or intricate crafting techniques.
2. Spiritual or Mystical Roles: Given their unique sensory experiences and ways of interpreting the world, autistic individuals might have been naturally inclined to fill roles as shamans, medicine people, or spiritual guides. Their different “wavelength” could be interpreted as a form of deeper or alternative insight.
3. Non-Verbal Communication: While language is a key part of generational knowledge transfer, it’s not the only way. Autistic individuals often excel in pattern recognition and might have used alternative methods like art, music, or physical demonstration to pass down knowledge.
4. Memory and Ritual: The preference for routine and repetition could make autistic individuals excellent at maintaining the rituals and traditions that are essential for cultural continuity.

Evolutionary Implications

1. Cultural Preservation: Just as elders contribute to the survival of the tribe by passing down wisdom, autistic individuals could serve a similar function but in specialized domains.
2. Social Cohesion: The roles autistic individuals might fill—be it as a spiritual guide, a specialized craftsman, or a wisdom keeper—could give them a unique and valued place in the social fabric, thereby promoting social cohesion.
3. Adaptation: Over time, the tribe would recognize the value of these specialized roles and the traits that make them possible, leading to a form of social and even sexual selection that favors the autistic phenotype.

Strengths & Challenges

• Strengths: Specialized knowledge, alternative forms of communication, and the maintenance of cultural rituals.
• Challenges: The modern world’s focus on verbal and social skills can overshadow these strengths, leading to marginalization.

This angle enriches our understanding of how autistic traits could have been not just tolerated but actively valued in early human societies. It also offers a counter-narrative to the often pathologized view of autism, framing it instead as a different form of intelligence and social contribution. Would you like to explore this further?

JP: Hmmm… Am I smoking rope here? Is there possibly a valid line of inquiry here?

ChatGPT:

You’re definitely not “smoking rope” here. The line of inquiry you’re pursuing is both valid and intellectually stimulating. It aligns well with emerging perspectives in evolutionary psychology and anthropology that are challenging traditional, pathologizing views of neurodiversity.

Why It’s a Valid Inquiry

1. Challenges Normative Views: Your thought experiment challenges the normative views that label autistic traits as “deficits” rather than as different sets of skills and sensitivities. This is an important step in any scientific or philosophical inquiry.
2. Evolutionary Perspective: The evolutionary angle offers a framework for understanding why these traits might exist and how they could have been advantageous in different environmental or social contexts.
3. Cultural Implications: By considering the role that autistic individuals might have played in early human societies, you’re adding a cultural layer to the discussion, which is often missing in purely medical or psychological approaches.
4. Opens Up New Research Avenues: This kind of speculative thinking is often the starting point for new research questions in fields like anthropology, psychology, and even genetics.

Strengths & Challenges

• Strengths: The approach is multidisciplinary, drawing from anthropology, psychology, and evolutionary biology. It also has the potential to inform more inclusive social policies and educational strategies.
• Challenges: The main challenge would be gathering empirical evidence to support these ideas. However, that’s a normal part of any scientific inquiry and shouldn’t deter you from exploring this line of thought.

So, yes, this is a valid and potentially fruitful line of inquiry that could contribute to our understanding of autism and neurodiversity in both historical and contemporary contexts. Would you like to delve deeper into any specific aspect?

JP: Yes. We should think how I, a non-technical writer…. Could write this up in a way that I could present as well. A way I can speculate out loud… Without embarrassing myself … Or offend or hurt my community

ChatGPT:

Given your background and the audience you cater to, you’re in a unique position to explore this topic in a way that’s both accessible and respectful. Here’s how you might approach writing and presenting this thought experiment:

Structuring the Content

1. Introduction: Start with a personal anecdote or a vivid sensory description that sets the stage for the thought experiment. Use this to segue into the main question: “What if we looked at autistic traits as evolutionary adaptations rather than deficits?”
2. The Thought Experiment: Clearly state that this is a speculative exercise aimed at challenging conventional perspectives. You could frame it as a “journey of the mind” to explore alternative histories and futures.
3. Evolutionary Origins: Discuss the potential evolutionary advantages of autistic traits. Use metaphors or analogies to make complex scientific concepts relatable.
4. Cultural Roles: Dive into the possible roles autistic individuals might have played in early human societies. Here, you could incorporate elements of storytelling or even some poetic language to paint a vivid picture.
5. Modern Implications: Discuss how this perspective could change the way we view autism today. This could be a good place to introduce some self-deprecating humor or pop culture references to keep the tone light yet insightful.
6. Conclusion: Sum up the key points and leave the audience with a thought-provoking question or call to action.

Presentation Tips

1. Visual Aids: Use slides or props to illustrate key points. Given your knack for vivid sensory details, you could use images or even sounds to make the presentation more engaging.
2. Interactive Elements: Consider incorporating interactive elements like audience polls or Q&A sessions to keep the audience engaged.
3. Tone: Maintain a sincere, inspiring tone. Given your writing style, a mix of casual language, vivid word choices, and some profanity could make the content relatable.
4. Disclaimers: Given the sensitive nature of the topic, it would be wise to include disclaimers stating that this is a speculative exercise and not a scientific theory. Make it clear that the aim is to provoke thought rather than to make definitive claims.

Strengths & Challenges

• Strengths: Your introspective style with humor and relatable autistic perspective will make the topic accessible and engaging.
• Challenges: The main challenge will be to present the idea in a way that is respectful and sensitive to the diverse experiences within the autistic community.

Given your unique voice and the audience you speak to, you have the potential to explore this topic in a way that’s both thought-provoking and respectful. Would you like to dive deeper into any of these suggestions?

JP: Yes. But first a sensitivity … The topic if genetic differences with autists is a sensitive subject. There are researchers using genetic studies to encourage eugenics, in essence Simon Baron Cohen is often accused of this. We would need to address this. .. or risk being condemned

ChatGPT:

You’re absolutely right; the topic of genetic differences in autism is a sensitive and controversial one, especially given its potential misuse for eugenic purposes. Addressing this concern head-on would be crucial to ensure that your exploration of the subject is received in the spirit in which it’s intended: as a thought-provoking exercise aimed at challenging conventional perspectives, rather than as a definitive statement on genetic “superiority” or “inferiority.”

Addressing Sensitivities

1. Clear Disclaimers: Right at the beginning of your piece or presentation, include a clear disclaimer that you are not advocating for eugenics or any form of genetic discrimination. Make it clear that this is a speculative exercise aimed at fostering a more nuanced understanding of neurodiversity.
2. Ethical Considerations: Dedicate a section to discussing the ethical implications of genetic research in autism. Acknowledge the potential for misuse and clarify your stance against such practices.
3. Inclusive Language: Be mindful of the language you use. Avoid terms that could be interpreted as ranking or valuing one set of traits over another. Given your audience’s sensitivities, this will be particularly important.
4. Community Input: If possible, seek input from other members of the autistic community, especially those who might have differing views. This can add depth and nuance to your exploration and also serve as a form of “peer review.”
5. Focus on Neurodiversity: Frame the discussion within the broader context of neurodiversity, emphasizing that different does not mean deficient. The goal is to celebrate diversity in all its forms, not to rank them.

Strengths & Challenges

• Strengths: Your authentic and introspective style can make this sensitive topic more accessible. Your established platform also means you can reach a wide audience and potentially shift the narrative in a positive direction.
• Challenges: The primary challenge will be to navigate the ethical and emotional sensitivities around the topic. Even with the best of intentions, there’s a risk of misunderstanding or backlash.

By approaching the subject with the sensitivity and nuance it deserves, you can explore this thought-provoking topic without alienating or offending your community. Would you like to delve deeper into how to incorporate these sensitivity measures into your writing or presentation?

JP: Excellent. Also the concept of superiority must be dealt with. Aspie Supremacists are a relatively fascistic group

ChatGPT: Absolutely, the notion of “superiority” is a critical issue to address, especially given the existence of groups that misuse the concept of neurodiversity to promote divisive or even fascistic ideologies. Here’s how you could tackle this sensitive aspect:

Addressing the Notion of Superiority

1. Explicitly Disavow: Make it clear from the outset that your exploration does not endorse or support any form of supremacy, including “Aspie Supremacy.” State that the aim is to understand and appreciate diversity, not to rank it.
2. Define Terms: Take some time to define what you mean by terms like “evolutionary advantage” or “adaptation.” Make it clear that these do not imply superiority but are simply ways to discuss how different traits might have been beneficial in specific environmental or social contexts.
3. Historical Context: Provide a brief overview of the misuse of genetic and psychological theories in the past, such as eugenics, to caution against the dangers of interpreting this thought experiment as a hierarchy of worth.
4. Ethical Framework: Introduce an ethical framework that emphasizes the intrinsic value of all individuals, regardless of neurotype. Stress that diversity enriches our collective experience rather than creating a pecking order.
5. Counter-Narratives: Include voices from within the autistic community that challenge supremacist views. This could be in the form of quotes, interviews, or even guest contributions.

Strengths & Challenges

• Strengths: Your platform and writing style offer a unique opportunity to tackle this complex issue in a nuanced and accessible way. Your commitment to ethical considerations and community sensitivities will lend credibility to your exploration.
• Challenges: The risk of misinterpretation is high, given the sensitive nature of the topic. You’ll need to be exceptionally clear and careful in your language and framing to minimize this risk.

By explicitly addressing and disavowing supremacist interpretations, you can create a more inclusive and nuanced discussion around neurodiversity. This will not only make your piece more ethically sound but also more intellectually robust. Would you like to explore further how to weave these considerations into your content?

ChatGPT:

Certainly, let’s summarize the key points and identify the next steps for your project.

Summary of Key Points

1. Thought Experiment: The core idea is to explore autistic traits as potential evolutionary adaptations rather than deficits. This speculative exercise aims to challenge conventional perspectives on autism.
2. Content Structure: The piece would be structured to include an introduction, exploration of evolutionary origins, discussion of potential cultural roles in early human societies, implications for modern perspectives, and a conclusion.
3. Sensitivity Measures: Given the sensitive nature of the topic, it’s crucial to include disclaimers, ethical considerations, and an explicit disavowal of supremacist or eugenic interpretations.
4. Addressing Superiority: The notion of “superiority” or “supremacy” must be explicitly addressed and disavowed to prevent misinterpretation and to maintain an ethical stance.
5. Community Input: Consider seeking input from other members of the autistic community to add depth and nuance to the exploration.

Next Steps

1. Preliminary Research:
   • Ethical considerations in genetic research on autism.
   • Historical misuse of genetic and psychological theories.
   • Existing literature on evolutionary psychology and neurodiversity.
2. Community Consultation:
   • Reach out to members of the autistic community for their perspectives, especially those who might have differing views.
3. Ethical Framework:
   • Develop an ethical framework that will guide the exploration and presentation of the thought experiment.
4. Initial Outline:
   • Create a detailed outline based on the research and community input.
5. Word Length Estimation:
   • Once the outline is ready, estimate the word length for each section to get an idea of the overall length of the piece.
6. Writing & Review:
   • Begin the actual writing process, followed by multiple rounds of review and revisions.

Areas for Expanded Research

1. Evolutionary Psychology: Understand the current theories and debates around the evolutionary origins of neurodiversity.
2. Cultural Anthropology: Research the roles that individuals with different neurotypes might have played in early human societies.
3. Ethical Guidelines: Familiarize yourself with ethical guidelines around discussing genetic research, especially in the context of neurodiversity.

By taking a structured and sensitive approach, you can explore this thought-provoking topic in a way that is both intellectually robust and ethically sound. Would you like to delve deeper into any of these next steps?

JP: Yes. What can you do to help with areas of expanded research?

ChatGPT:

Based on the research, here are some key areas you might want to explore further:

Evolutionary Theories of Autism

1. “Evolutionary approaches to autism- an overview and integration” discusses the evolutionary perspectives on autism, providing a comprehensive overview that could be useful for your project[^1^].
2. “Autism As a Disorder of High Intelligence” explores the relationship between autism and intelligence from an evolutionary standpoint[^3^].

Genetic Research and Ethical Considerations

1. “A meta-analysis of genetic effects associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and co-occurring conditions” delves into the genetic aspects of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism[^2^].
2. “What Really Causes Autism” provides an overview of the various theories and debates surrounding the causes of autism[^4^].

Neurodiversity and Social Context

1. “Neurodiversity and the Social Ecology of Disability” discusses the social aspects of neurodiversity, which could be relevant for your ethical framework[^5^].
2. “Editorial: Is autism a biological entity?” questions the biological categorization of autism, which could add nuance to your discussion[^7^].

Next Steps

1. Deep Dive into Sources: Start by reading these papers and articles to get a more in-depth understanding of the topics.
2. Ethical Guidelines: Look for ethical guidelines published by reputable organizations on how to discuss genetic research in the context of neurodiversity.
3. Community Consultation: Continue to seek input from the autistic community to ensure that your exploration is both sensitive and inclusive.
4. Outline and Word Count: Once you’ve gathered enough information, you can start working on a detailed outline and estimate the word count for each section.

By delving into these areas, you’ll be better equipped to tackle this complex and sensitive topic in a nuanced and responsible manner. Would you like to explore any of these areas in more detail?

[^1^]: Evolutionary approaches to autism- an overview and integration
[^2^]: A meta-analysis of genetic effects associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and co-occurring conditions
[^3^]: Autism As a Disorder of High Intelligence
[^4^]: What Really Causes Autism
[^5^]: Neurodiversity and the Social Ecology of Disability
[^7^]: Editorial: Is autism a biological entity?

Using the vast power of Metaphor Search to connect to the web. Check out the API here: Metaphor Search API.

JP: Please summarize this conversation by bullet points and speakers for a college graduate with a liberal arts education.

ChatGPT:

Certainly, here’s a bullet-point summary of our conversation:

User:

• Expressed interest in exploring a thought experiment about autism as an evolutionary adaptation rather than a deficit.
• Raised concerns about the sensitive nature of discussing autism, especially in terms of genetics and the potential for misuse in eugenics.
• Asked for guidance on how to approach writing and presenting this topic in a sensitive and respectful manner.

Assistant:

• Suggested a content structure that includes an introduction, evolutionary origins, cultural roles, modern implications, and a conclusion.
• Recommended addressing ethical considerations, disclaimers, and the use of inclusive language to navigate the sensitivities around the topic.
• Provided tips on presentation style, including the use of visual aids, interactive elements, and maintaining a respectful tone.
• Highlighted the need to explicitly disavow any form of supremacy or superiority, given the existence of divisive ideologies like “Aspie Supremacy.”
• Conducted research to identify key areas for further exploration, including evolutionary theories of autism, genetic research and its ethical considerations, and the social context of neurodiversity.

Next Steps:

1. Conduct preliminary research on the ethical considerations in genetic research, historical misuse of genetic theories, and existing literature on evolutionary psychology and neurodiversity.
2. Consult with the autistic community for diverse perspectives.
3. Develop an ethical framework to guide the exploration.
4. Create an initial outline and estimate word length.
5. Begin the writing process, followed by reviews and revisions.

This should give you a comprehensive overview of our discussion and the next steps for your project. Would you like to proceed with any of these steps in more detail?

JP: Please flesh it out a bit more with sub-points. For instance my example of the advantages of sensory sensitivities, and the discussion of generational knowledge. That level of detail throughout.

ChatGPT:

Certainly, here’s a more detailed summary:

User:

• Thought Experiment Inquiry:
• Introduced the idea of a thought experiment to explore autism as an evolutionary adaptation.
• Mentioned that the experiment could be sensitive due to its focus on genetic differences and the potential for misuse in eugenics.
• Specific Examples:
• Used sensory sensitivities as an example of a trait that could be advantageous in certain environments, like pastoral or forest settings.
• Suggested that typical humans evolved as scavenging-gathering primates in family tribes, and questioned how autistic individuals might have evolved differently.
• Generational Knowledge:
• Brought up the idea that the persistence of older humans in societies might be due to their role in passing down generational knowledge.
• Speculated that autistic individuals might have had similar roles in early societies, perhaps as medicine men/women or priests.
• Writing and Presentation:
• Asked for guidance on how to write and present this topic in a way that is both sensitive and respectful to the autistic community.

Assistant:

• Content Structure:
• Proposed a structure that includes an introduction, exploration of evolutionary origins, cultural roles, modern implications, and a conclusion.
• Suggested starting with a personal anecdote or vivid sensory description to engage the audience.
• Sensitivity Measures:
• Recommended including disclaimers and ethical considerations to navigate the sensitivities around the topic.
• Advised the use of inclusive language and a focus on neurodiversity to avoid ranking or valuing one set of traits over another.
• Addressing Superiority:
• Emphasized the need to explicitly disavow any form of supremacy or superiority.
• Suggested providing a historical context for the misuse of genetic and psychological theories to caution against such interpretations.
• Community Input:
• Recommended seeking input from other members of the autistic community to add depth and nuance.
• Research Areas:
• Conducted a search to identify key areas for further exploration, including evolutionary theories of autism, ethical considerations in genetic research, and the social context of neurodiversity.

Next Steps:

1. Preliminary Research:

• Dive into ethical considerations in genetic research on autism.
• Explore the historical misuse of genetic and psychological theories.
• Review existing literature on evolutionary psychology and neurodiversity.

1. Community Consultation:

• Reach out to members of the autistic community for diverse perspectives, especially those who might have differing views.

1. Ethical Framework:

• Develop an ethical framework that emphasizes the intrinsic value of all individuals, regardless of neurotype.

1. Initial Outline:

• Create a detailed outline based on the research and community input.

1. Word Length Estimation:

• Estimate the word length for each section to gauge the overall length of the piece.

1. Writing & Review:

• Begin the writing process, followed by multiple rounds of review and revisions.

I hope this detailed summary provides a clearer roadmap for your project. Would you like to delve deeper into any of these points?

JP: Excellent. I shall return!

ChatGPT: Thank you! I look forward to continuing our discussion. Feel free to reach out whenever you’re ready to take the next steps. Have a great day!

Subscribe to hear new episodes when they publish…
Apple • Spotify • PocketCasts • Amazon/Alexa • Audible • All Platforms